Реферат: GenderBalance Scorecard: Sample Template
Gender scorecard for sample department
GenderBalance Scorecard: Sample Template
Population: Staff in the Professional and higher categories with appointments of one year or more for the period
date
Distribution of staff per department for the period
1a
^ Gender distribution of staff by grade and department, office, division, branch, service, section and unit for the period : June 2009
USG
ASG
D-2
D-1
P-5
P-4
P-3
P-2
Total
General Total
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
^ Percentage of women
1b
^ Percentages of female staff representation in DPKO
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
D1
D2
ASG
USG
December 31, 2007
June 30, 2009
Total increment 2007-2009
Average annual increment (Dec. 2007 - Jun. 2009)
Year at which gender parity will be reached at current average annual increment
Required average annual increase to achieve gender balance of 50% in all prof categories by 2010 and in all D and above by 2015. Formula 50-B3 divided by 7(number of years)
By meeting 2% annual increase target in the HRAPs
Selection, career progression and retention
2
^ Selection rates of staff for the period 1 January - June 2009
USG
ASG
D-2
D-1
P-5
P-4
P-3
P-2
Total
General Total
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
^ Percentage of women
3
^ Promotions for the period : 1 January 2009 - 30 June 2009
USG
ASG
D-2
D-1
P-5
P-4
P-3
P-2
Total
General Total
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
^ Percentage of women
4
^ Appointments for the period : 1 January 2009 - 30 June 2009
USG
ASG
D-2
D-1
P-5
P-4
P-3
P-2
Total
General Total
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
3
^ Percentage of women
5
^ Lateral transfers for the period : 1 January 2009 - 30 June 2009
USG
ASG
D-2
D-1
P-5
P-4
P-3
P-2
Total
General Total
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
^ Percentage of women
6
^ Percentage of women applicants forwarded to PCO, interviewed, placed on recommended lists and selected for the period : 1 January 2009 - 30 June 2009
USG
ASG
D-2
D-1
P-5
P-4
P-3
P-2
Total
General Total
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
^ Percentage of women
^ Question will be included and information will be available upon the next survey.
7
Separations and attrition rates excluding retirements for the period : 1 January 2009 - 30 June 2009
^ Reasons for Separation
USG
ASG
D-2
D-1
P-5
P-4
P-3
P-2
Total
General Total
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
^ Agreed Termination
Percentage of women
^ Appointment Expiration
^ Percentage of women
Resignation
^ Percentage of women
Termination-Health
^ Percentage of women
8
Performance of HRAP gender balance target for the period : 1 January 2009 - 30 June 2009
USG
ASG
D-2
D-1
P-5
P-4
P-3
P-2
Total
General Total
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
^ Percentages of women
9
^ Separations by retirement for the period 1 January 2009 - 30 June 2009 and 1 January 2007 – 30 December 2008
USG
ASG
D-2
D-1
P-5
P-4
P-3
P-2
Total
General Total
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
^ Retirements 1/1/07 – 30/6/09
^ Percentage of women
^ Early Retirements 1/1/07 - 31/12/08
^ Percentage of women
^ Functioning of the Focal Point (FP) system in a Sample Department for the period 1 January – 30 June 2009
Indicators
Comments
Functioning of the Focal Point (FP) system
10
Number of currently designated Focal Points and Alternates a indicated by survey respondents
Focal Point
Alternate
11
Information provided by management to Focal Points in the last 6 months
STATUS
12
Participation of Focal Points in staff selection panels in the last 6 months
13
Number of meetings with Executive Office/USG in the last 6 months
More than times
14
Actions taken by management to increase awareness about the Focal Point in the last 6 months
STATUS
Description of innovative measures for gender balance and gender sensitivity
15
Measures taken by management to achieve 50/50 gender distribution at the Professional level and above in the last 6 months
Information
STATUS
16
Measures taken by management to develop and maintain a gender sensitive and supportive work environment in the last 6 months
STATUS
Use of Flexible Working Arrangements (FWA)
17
Distribution of staff formally using each FWA option, by department, gender, grade and age in the last 6 months
18
Actions taken by management to promote FWA in the last 6 months
^ Gender Profile: Sample Department
Gender Distribution by Division, Section and Unit as of 1 July 2008
Division/Section/Unit
USG
ASG
D2
D1
P5
P4
P3
P2
Total
Grand Total
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
еще рефераты
Еще работы по разное